Comments on: A Key Skill: How to Calculate Formal Charge https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/ Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:14:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-679338 Sun, 10 Dec 2023 13:35:36 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-679338 In reply to Kim.

Thank you very much!

]]>
By: Kim https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-676789 Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:50:06 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-676789 Hello,
thanks for your wonderful posts on organic chemistry. It reallys helps me to recap org chem and I really like how you explain all these topics with a bit of humor.

That said, I think in this posts may be some typos:
I think there are two typos in the solution of the last quiz of chapter 3 (ID 2310):
(a) In the third task [C3H7N] of the quiz, there is just one electron on the negative charged carbon. Shouldn’t there be two electrons?
(b) And in the fourth task [O-CH2] the sign of the formal charge of the carbon atom should be +1 (in the calculation).
(c) Note 4 says “(…) of various compounds of first-row elements.” Aren’t the shown elements in the picture from the second row of the periodic table?

]]>
By: Pulkit https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-646118 Sat, 14 Jan 2023 08:27:38 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-646118 Your explanations and examples were clear and easy to understand. I appreciate the detailed step-by-step instructions, which made it easy to follow along and understand the concept. Thank you for taking the time to create this helpful resource

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-636859 Thu, 01 Sep 2022 14:12:29 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-636859 In reply to Hyunwhan Joe.

Fixed. Thanks for the spot!

]]>
By: Hyunwhan Joe https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-636836 Thu, 01 Sep 2022 08:29:43 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-636836 I think for Quiz ID: 2310, the formal charge for the carbon in the fourth molecule should be +1 instead of -1.

]]>
By: Abinash Kumar Nath https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-631995 Mon, 04 Jul 2022 17:31:38 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-631995 Thank you so much sir. Finally i understood how to calculate the formal charge

]]>
By: Gullshair ali alchemist https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-624838 Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:30:22 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-624838 Nice simple explanation

]]>
By: James Ashenhurst https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-586227 Fri, 16 Oct 2020 19:14:36 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-586227 In reply to Mina.

Ah. I should have been more clear. The number of bonding electrons in BH4 equals 8, since each bond has two electrons and there are 4 B-H bonds. Half of this number equals 4. This should give you the same answer.
I have updated the post to make this more explicit.

]]>
By: Siva Kumar https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-586082 Wed, 14 Oct 2020 16:58:34 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-586082 Great teaching , can I know where did u studied ??

]]>
By: Mina https://www.masterorganicchemistry.com/2010/09/24/how-to-calculate-formal-charge/#comment-585437 Mon, 28 Sep 2020 01:51:11 +0000 http://masterorganicchemistry.wordpress.com/?p=897#comment-585437 Hi I am extremely confused. The two formulas for calculating FC that you provided are not the same and don’t produce the same results when I tried them out.

Formal charge = [# of valence electrons] – [electrons in lone pairs + 1/2 the number of bonding electrons]

and

Formal Charge = [# of valence electrons on atom] – [non-bonded electrons + number of bonds].

They do not produce the same result…
If I have the formula BH4, and use the first formula provided to find FC of B, I would get:

(3) – (0 + 2) = +1

Using the second formula provided:

(3) – (0+4) = -1

Aren’t these formulas supposed to produce the same results? I am quite confused and I don’t know if I missed something.

]]>